Join me @ IBOtoolbox for free.
Vlad Tverdohleb
Member Since: 7/26/2015
  
performance / stats
Country: Canada
Likes Received: 151
Featured Member: 1 times
Associates: 155
Wall Posts: 382
Comments Made: 63
Press Releases: 370
Videos: 0
Phone: 015144814545
Skype:     theprservices
profile visitor stats
TODAY: 23
THIS MONTH: 798
TOTAL: 72061
are we ibo associates?
recent videos
member advertising
none
active associates
Bill Bateman     
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Brian Stefan    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Athena Gay    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


PHIL SCHAEFER    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Phil Schaefer    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Mark Turnbull    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Bruno Duarte    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


QUEENHAJAR AKANQI      
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Mike Farris    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Marlena Burton    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Chuck Reynolds    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Sule Yesufu    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Velma Joseph     
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Csaba Juhasz    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


Eugenijus Sakalauskas    
Last logged on: 6/20/2019


other ibo platforms
Vlad Tverdohleb   My Press Releases

Creating Genetically Modified Babies Is “Morally Permissible,” Says Ethics Committee

Published on 7/18/2018
For additional information  Click Here

ETHICALLY ACCEPTABLE. We may have just moved one step closer to designer babies. On Tuesday, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (NCB), an independent U.K.-based organization that analyzes and reports on ethical issues in biology and medicine, released a report focused on the social and ethical issues surrounding human genome editing and reproduction.

According to the report, editing human embryos, sperm, or eggs is “morally permissible” as long as the edit doesn’t jeopardize the welfare of the future person (the one born from the edited embryo) or “increase disadvantage, discrimination, or division in society.”

PROCEED WITH CAUTION. The NCB report doesn’t say we should only make edits to embryos for therapeutic reasons, meaning changes for cosmetic reasons are still on the table, ethically speaking. However, by no means does the report suggest we jump right into editing human embryos.

Before we get to that point, we must conduct further research to establish safety standards, according to the report. We’ll also need to publicly debate the use of the technology and consider its possible implications. Additionally, we’ll need to assess any potential risks to individuals, groups, or society in general, and figure out a system for monitoring and addressing any unforeseen adverse affects as they may crop up.

After all that, gene-editing in humans will still need to be closely regulated by government agencies, and we’ll want to start by using it only in closely monitored clinical studies, says the NCB.

AN INFLUENTIAL VOICE. The NCB can’t actually write laws or establish any standards for the use of gene-editing in humans. However, the Council’s recommendations do carry some weight, with the BBC referring to the organization as “influential.”

 

Read more here.

Member Note: To comment on this PR, simply click reply on the owners main post below.
-  Copyright 2016 IBOsocial  -            Part of the IBOtoolbox family of sites.